data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f139/5f1393a10e3811f0c2b1928182282f3589a70d73" alt=""
The Firecracker 50 has officially gone the way of the 4th of July. A colorful day already circling the globe on it's way back for next year. Can't say that I'm real excited about my 8th place finish. But lets look at something. Check out the results. If you notice I'm the only person from East of the Rockies in the top 20. Not that that is real special, I just want to point out that there is poor representation from the East Coast at the National Championship race. As a matter of fact there is almost none. I think I can count on one hand how many people I can identify that come from the far or mid east. Who's fault is this? Are the east coasters scared? Weak? Not competative? Or are they realistic? Racing at 9,600 feet and up doesn't exactly feel encouraging for flat-landers. This is the 3rd year in a row that the marathon National Championship has been at elevation. It would have been at Mt. Snow if not for some logistical issues with the mountain. So what does USACYCLING do? They send the Marathon back to high elevation for, get this, TWO years.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3923b/3923b16023ea40cb967f207631e06ebe3002ce78" alt=""
USA Cycling needs to learn that they should be a representative of all cycling not just a of those who pay into their pockets. There are a lot of great races that don't require NORBA membership. But I have a feeling that when USAC sent out a call for bids they only sent the call to races that were already in their circle. I'll find out soon, because I'm going to start the petition process to move the marathon to the east for next year.
This will present a problem because of all the non-USAC affiliated races, that might not want to deal with the headache of dealing with cycling's governing organization.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03cb8/03cb8aecd53649c7e911664bb482e7ebedf5093b" alt=""
Where is the healing?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/677f8/677f8fb2962e33ac6edff5cacd970765eea62192" alt=""
Race report::I'll do it tomorrow. 7/8/07
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ded28/ded28f718854e83c54514077bd98941a460d5a6c" alt=""
7 comments:
Good read and I agree. Altitude, in the middle of the week, and 20+ hours away. Yes these are excuses and I hate them but we could at least narrow them down to one or two every couple years.
Shey
Good read and I agree. Altitude, in the middle of the week, and 20+ hours away. Yes these are excuses and I hate them but we could at least narrow them down to one or two every couple years.
i agree - seems like there is no balancing act with mountain bike racing.
i have no issues with a race being on the west coast - but when 90% of the races are west coast, and a national event is held two years in a row at elevation -- it's unrealistic an east coast rider will do well or even come to the event.
and don't get me going on the enduro series they have.
You are on the right course....keep on keeping on....
Shawn Adams
You are on the right course.....Keep on keeping on
SAdams
I have some idea that East Coast riders are tougher, grittier and generally better trail riders. You are a good person to rep. keep up the hard work. You also do a good job expressing your views thru log entries. Tx
Thanks for the interest. THis thing will get rolling soon.
Post a Comment